The Confusing Colour of Politics

Red is Socialism, Blue is Tory-ism, Yellow is Liberalism and Green is...

Green is bit of all three and then it's own as well.

I have been encouraged recently by such movements as Red Tory-ism and Blue Labour. This to me shows that these parties are realising after 50 years of hard liners and dogmatic principles that they might not be right. There may be a solution other than theirs.

This may be a result of the coalition, or a result of Blair dragging the Labour Party as far right as it ever has been. The question remains, will this continue. Can we coalesce in Politics in the UK. Can we live in an accepting and tolerant society that looks to make long term decisions for the greater good and not short term decisions for votes.

Whatever this will look like in the future it is clear that there will have to be Blue, Yellow, Red and more importantly Green. To make long term changes you need collective support. We cannot progress with minority leadership. a brief look at our train network and its awkward future highlights the matter perfectly.

Tweet

How Green is your Business?

Do you know do you care?

Is it about your logo or your practice areas? Is it how your employee's behave in the office?

Is it the way you are approaching new business ideas and opportunities?

In reality you probably don't have the time to lift your head off the desk and when you do, you ask yourself if it really matters.

Some of it won't matter today or next week. Some of it may stop you winning a new client. Eventually it will matter, but when is too late?

Tweet

Banks and the future

I have been speaking to a range of people recently on the future of money and in particular the future of finance. The media will tell us that banks are a spent force, but it would seem that actually Governments are a spent force. The threat of credit agencies down grading government ratings is not a step that will encourage them to spend.

So as a result where does that leave funding in the economy. Banks, were never going to be the catalyst. My one wish in all this is that we'd stop expecting them to suddenly open a sluice gate. We are just as much to blame as the Banks are. Ultimately they are controlled by their shareholders and always will be. The mutual movement has signs of hope in the retail sector. The sensible businesses that held true to their business models still have a vital role in the mortgage and saving market. The area that retail finance needs to focus.

But the driving question is growth. Growth will come from business and SME's will be dealt with by the Banks. This is their focus, and we shouldn't punish them for that. Good businesses will continue to get support.

But what about start ups, community enterprises, the big society, renewable energy, co-operatives. I heard a story the other day that the Co-Operative Bank had suggested a new business venture avoid using the Co-Operative model as they didn't understand it.

This world is specialist and not very profitable to big institutions. A call centre couldn't support the demands of micro business. They need coaching, mentoring and support, but as recent micro finance schemes show they can be profitable.

So instead of blaming big Banks, shouting at the Government or thinking we are without solution, we need to start thinking about money and finance differently. There is a new age upon us, an age where money will change in its meaning. We will not just look for interest rates, but for the value our savings can add. Let's start mobilising and stop waiting for a clunky overly complicated Government to tell us what to do.

Big Society Bank in Leeds? Maybe just a community focused mutual in Leeds!

Tweet

Sustainability in Leeds

I was reading yesterday the guest blog by Paul Thomas for the Guardian Leeds. The title of which is "Does Leeds want to become a sustainable City". The blog by Paul and the comments following were very interesting reading.

Apparently sustainability is not the way forward in Paul's mind and for other people it absolutely is, we need to be greener, leaner and manage our resources better. However this led me back to my overriding issue with the word sustainability. Whilst I think the word is valuable the use of the word isn't valuable at all.

Having done a quick dictionary search on the meaning of sustainability, it is clear that most people have got it all wrong. It doesn't mean hand made jumpers, beards and long hair. It doesn't mean wind turbines, cycling to work and communal living either. Sustainability derives form sustain, to hold up, to provide, to support.

With this piece of insight why would anybody not want a sustainable society? One where communities support each other. Where food, housing and transport needs are met for all. Does this sound like a society restricted from growth or consumption? No, it is purely a society that sustains itself.

Should Leeds be a sustainable city? Yes, undoubtedly. For the benefit of its citizens it should be sustainable. Now we can talk about how, but I think the bigger question is whether Leeds can be a sustainable City? More importantly does it have it in it to break some barriers and be different?

Is our future Nuclear?

Recent, tragic occurrences in Japan have raised yet more concerns over the use of Nuclear power in the long term. The government has been a key driver in the establishment of Nuclear Fuels in the UK funding research and build costs of power stations up and down the country.

However, this is also, potentially, the most environmentally damaging energy source. Whilst it is low carbon and a good chunk of the material can be recycled it can have devastating implications on the global environment when it goes wrong. The mining of Uranium is hardly clean either.

The question has to be, why does the government continue to support and plough capital into Nuclear power but is so reticent to do so with true renewable energy such as tidal, wave, wind and hydro? With our geography and topography these are surely where our future energy opportunities are. When will people sit up and start thinking long term.

I am sure that all those NIMBY's who oppose wind turbines would rather have 20 turbines on the landscape than a new Nuclear Power Station on their doorstep. It seems to be that we have to start making that choice sooner rather than later, however to achieve the scale needed we need national and local government to support with more than just words.

Can we really change?

I was at a climate change meeting yesterday where the challenge was put to the group to shift from a linear to a circular economy.

The challenges were made around market forces driving change and innovation and how cities can develop naturally as ecosystems.

In reality, the will always be a wasteful race. We have always been. Recycling has been around for years but is not in our nature. We are developed beings that will always be wasteful with the resources we have. We will be greedy and take resource from others.

Can we truly change how we behave and live? Do we have the courage to forget about self? Can you change?

An economy we can no longer service...

I have just been reading an article outline the work done by Tesco and Sainsburys creating jobs in growing stores and they call this Corporate Responsibility (CR).

Do we now have to rely on charity from Corporates to create new jobs? Have we completely lost the idea and hope of a growing economy?

I have always being troubled by the statistic that 80% of UK employment is in the form of the Service industry. Not making primary or secondary industry but pure tertiary work, servicing the consumers in the UK. We are continually recycling our income and wealth and with a growing rate of unemployment these service industries are under threat as the disposable income to service each other will diminish.

The early noughties supported this shift in employment as more people had money, could borrow money etc.. but as the economy declines so does the value of this economy. As it grew itself it will also shrink itself.

We need to radically look at where jobs can be created and where the value in our economy should be coming from. Not emerging opportunities but existing opportunities in a global market.